Where it fits well
- 130 kt cruise supports efficient local and regional flying.
- 754 nm advertised range creates a practical planning radius of about 543 nm with 2 occupants.
- 249 kg realistic payload proxy and 2 seats define the usable cabin mission.
Key figures
Indicative planning data, compiled 2026-07. Verify against the AFM and records.
| Seats | 2 |
| Realistic payload with mission fuel | 249 kg |
| Advertised range | 754 nm |
| Practical planning radius (4 people) | 505 nm |
| Cruise speed | 130 kt |
| Runway need | ~300 m |
| Pressurised | No |
| Fuel | Mogas / UL91 |
| Fixed annual base | €10k |
| Direct cost per flight hour | €80 |
The ownership trade-off
Very fast and efficient for two, but retractable-gear and engine options make apparently similar aircraft hard to compare.
Cost picture at different usage
- 40 hours/year: about €13k per year ( €330 per flight hour all-in)
- 80 hours/year: about €16k per year ( €205 per flight hour all-in)
- 120 hours/year: about €20k per year ( €163 per flight hour all-in)
- 180 hours/year: about €24k per year ( €136 per flight hour all-in)
Older examples add calendar-driven maintenance: a 2011-built airframe is estimated at €19k per year at 80 hours. Condition, engine time remaining and avionics matter more than the year itself — price the aircraft in front of you, not the model.
Limitations to price honestly
- Very fast and efficient for two, but retractable-gear and engine options make apparently similar aircraft hard to compare.
- €10k fixed annual planning base before flying a single hour.
- Approximate 300 m take-off requirement must be checked against runway, surface, slope, temperature and loading.
Recommended missions
- Solo or two-person flying where low complexity matters more than cabin capacity.
- Short and medium regional trips, accepting fuel stops when conditions require.
- Recreational, training or personal travel where operating efficiency is more important than airline-like speed.