Leonardo AW109 PowerPhoto: Ikiwaner · CC BY-SA 3.0 · representative variant
Indicative 2010 market price€4.14m to €4.95m
Estimated annual cost at 80 h€441k
Five-year cash outlay€6.71m

Key figures

Indicative planning data, compiled 2026-07. Verify against the AFM and records.

Seats8
Realistic payload with mission fuel768 kg
Published planning range500 nm
Practical planning radius (4 people)335 nm
Cruise speed154 kt
Runway needVertical
PressurisedNo
FuelJet A-1
Fixed annual base€250k
Direct cost per flight hour2200

The ownership trade-off

Fast, elegant and capable, but twin-engine component lives, retractable gear and specialist support are expensive.

Cost picture at different usage

  • 40 hours/year: about €353k per year ( €8825 per flight hour all-in)
  • 80 hours/year: about €441k per year ( €5513 per flight hour all-in)
  • 120 hours/year: about €529k per year ( €4408 per flight hour all-in)
  • 180 hours/year: about €661k per year ( €3672 per flight hour all-in)

Older examples add calendar-driven maintenance: a 2011-built airframe is estimated at €439k per year at 80 hours. Condition, engine time remaining and avionics matter more than the year itself, so price the aircraft in front of you, not the model.

Where it fits well

  • 154 kt cruise supports credible cross-country touring.
  • 500 nm published range creates a practical planning radius of about 335 nm with 4 occupants.
  • 768 kg realistic payload proxy and 8 seats define the usable cabin mission.

Limitations to price honestly

  • Fast, elegant and capable, but twin-engine component lives, retractable gear and specialist support are expensive.
  • €250k fixed annual planning base before flying a single hour.
  • Component life and mission-specific landing permissions dominate real-world utility.

Recommended missions

  • Family and small-group touring with a weight-and-balance check for every trip.
  • Short and medium regional trips, accepting fuel stops when conditions require.
  • Recreational, training or personal travel where operating efficiency is more important than airline-like speed.

Similar aircraft to consider