Indicative 1990 market price€239k€286k
Estimated annual cost at 80 h€73k
Five-year cash outlay€627k

Key figures

Indicative planning data, compiled 2026-07. Verify against the AFM and records.

Seats4
Realistic payload with mission fuel398 kg
Advertised range920 nm
Practical planning radius (4 people)616 nm
Cruise speed174 kt
Runway need~590 m
PressurisedNo
FuelAvgas 100LL
Fixed annual base€26k
Direct cost per flight hour235

The ownership trade-off

Excellent speed and handling in a compact cabin, but engine, gear, corrosion and restoration quality dominate value.

Cost picture at different usage

  • 40 hours/year: about €64k per year ( €1600 per flight hour all-in)
  • 80 hours/year: about €73k per year ( €918 per flight hour all-in)
  • 120 hours/year: about €83k per year ( €690 per flight hour all-in)
  • 180 hours/year: about €97k per year ( €538 per flight hour all-in)

Older examples add calendar-driven maintenance: a 2011-built airframe is estimated at €50k per year at 80 hours. Condition, engine time remaining and avionics matter more than the year itself — price the aircraft in front of you, not the model.

Where it fits well

  • 174 kt cruise supports credible cross-country touring.
  • 920 nm advertised range creates a practical planning radius of about 616 nm with 4 occupants.
  • 398 kg realistic payload proxy and 4 seats define the usable cabin mission.

Limitations to price honestly

  • Excellent speed and handling in a compact cabin, but engine, gear, corrosion and restoration quality dominate value.
  • €26k fixed annual planning base before flying a single hour.
  • Approximate 590 m take-off requirement must be checked against runway, surface, slope, temperature and loading.

Recommended missions

  • Family and small-group touring with a weight-and-balance check for every trip.
  • Short and medium regional trips, accepting fuel stops when conditions require.
  • Recreational, training or personal travel where operating efficiency is more important than airline-like speed.

Similar aircraft to consider