Piper Saratoga II HPPhoto: ZLEA · CC BY-SA 4.0 · representative variant
Indicative 2005 market price€302k€361k
Estimated annual cost at 80 h€67k
Five-year cash outlay€663k

Key figures

Indicative planning data, compiled 2026-07. Verify against the AFM and records.

Seats6
Realistic payload with mission fuel487 kg
Advertised range900 nm
Practical planning radius (4 people)603 nm
Cruise speed165 kt
Runway need~600 m
PressurisedNo
FuelAvgas 100LL
Fixed annual base€32k
Direct cost per flight hour285

The ownership trade-off

A genuinely useful six-seat cabin without turbo complexity, but gear, fuel burn and avionics make ownership expensive.

Cost picture at different usage

  • 40 hours/year: about €56k per year ( €1388 per flight hour all-in)
  • 80 hours/year: about €67k per year ( €836 per flight hour all-in)
  • 120 hours/year: about €78k per year ( €653 per flight hour all-in)
  • 180 hours/year: about €95k per year ( €530 per flight hour all-in)

Older examples add calendar-driven maintenance: a 2011-built airframe is estimated at €60k per year at 80 hours. Condition, engine time remaining and avionics matter more than the year itself — price the aircraft in front of you, not the model.

Where it fits well

  • 165 kt cruise supports credible cross-country touring.
  • 900 nm advertised range creates a practical planning radius of about 603 nm with 4 occupants.
  • 487 kg realistic payload proxy and 6 seats define the usable cabin mission.

Limitations to price honestly

  • A genuinely useful six-seat cabin without turbo complexity, but gear, fuel burn and avionics make ownership expensive.
  • €32k fixed annual planning base before flying a single hour.
  • Approximate 600 m take-off requirement must be checked against runway, surface, slope, temperature and loading.

Recommended missions

  • Family and small-group touring with a weight-and-balance check for every trip.
  • Short and medium regional trips, accepting fuel stops when conditions require.
  • Recreational, training or personal travel where operating efficiency is more important than airline-like speed.

Similar aircraft to consider