The decision in one question

Do you prioritise speed, avionics and a parachute, or raw useful load and short-field ability at lower cost?

The table below uses the same versioned PlaneFit dataset as the Finder. Prices and operating costs are planning estimates, not quotations.

Decision factorCirrus SR22 G7+View aircraft profileCessna 182T SkylaneView aircraft profileCirrus TRAC22View aircraft profile
Typical market year202620232026
Estimated purchase€814k€580k€1m
Annual cash cost at 80 h€67k€43k€65k
Five-year cash outlay€1.15m€797k€1.32m
Cruise speed183 kt145 kt183 kt
Advertised range1169 nm915 nm1169 nm
Seats545
Realistic payload448 kg365 kg432 kg
Runway need569 m461 m330 m
Data confidenceNormalized for direct comparisonNormalized for direct comparisonPreliminary, verify source data before deciding
Main trade-offFast, capable and highly marketable, but acquisition cost, CAPS calendar events and insurance are substantial.A strong real-world four-seat traveller, but fuel burn and nose-heavy handling demand more budget and discipline than a 172.High useful load and advanced systems make it a powerful training platform, but acquisition cost and fleet wear are substantial.

Where each aircraft wins

A factual first pass. Mission, condition and configuration can outweigh a brochure advantage.

Lower indicative purchase priceCessna 182T Skylane
Lower estimated annual costCessna 182T Skylane
Faster cruiseCirrus SR22 G7+
Longer advertised rangeCirrus SR22 G7+
More realistic payloadCirrus SR22 G7+
Shorter take-off requirementCessna 182T Skylane

Choose Cirrus SR22 G7+ when...

Five-seat high-performance personal transport. Its central ownership trade-off is: Fast, capable and highly marketable, but acquisition cost, CAPS calendar events and insurance are substantial.

Planning snapshot: €814k indicative price and €67k annual cash cost at 80 hours.

Read the full aircraft profile →

Choose Cessna 182T Skylane when...

Four-seat high-performance touring and utility aircraft. Its central ownership trade-off is: A strong real-world four-seat traveller, but fuel burn and nose-heavy handling demand more budget and discipline than a 172.

Planning snapshot: €580k indicative price and €43k annual cash cost at 80 hours.

Read the full aircraft profile →
Your mission, not a generic winner

Test both aircraft against your airports, passengers and annual budget

Open Aircraft Finder