Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Aeroprakt A-32 VixxenView aircraft profile	TL Ultralight Sting S4View aircraft profile	Tecnam P92 Echo MkIIView aircraft profile
Typical market year	2025	2025	2025
Estimated purchase	€150k	€170k	€175k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€15k	€15k	€15k
Five-year cash outlay	€223k	€245k	€248k
Cruise speed	115 kt	115 kt	115 kt
Advertised range	650 nm	700 nm	700 nm
Seats	2	2	2
Realistic payload	232 kg	199 kg	198 kg
Runway need	250 m	300 m	369 m
Data confidence	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	Faster and more refined than the Foxbat, but still limited to two seats and a light-aircraft mission.	Efficient and pleasant for recreational touring, but useful load and baggage margins are limited.	Friendly, efficient and easy to operate, but two seats and modest baggage limit longer touring missions.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner