Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Cessna 402C BusinesslinerView aircraft profile	Piper PA-31-350 Navajo ChieftainView aircraft profile	Cessna 414A ChancellorView aircraft profile
Typical market year	1982	1980	1982
Estimated purchase	€500k	€450k	€500k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€210k	€220k	€197k
Five-year cash outlay	€1.55m	€1.55m	€1.48m
Cruise speed	196 kt	190 kt	205 kt
Advertised range	1200 nm	885 nm	1107 nm
Seats	10	10	8
Realistic payload	992 kg	722 kg	739 kg
Runway need	750 m	780 m	800 m
Data confidence	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	Large cabin and productive commercial utility, but cycles, corrosion and two turbocharged engines require professional oversight.	A large and productive cabin, but commercial-use fatigue, two turbocharged engines and high fuel burn require professional oversight.	A large pressurized cabin for the purchase price, but twin turbocharged engines and complex ageing systems can produce severe maintenance events.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner