Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Cessna T206H Turbo Stationair HDView aircraft profile	Diamond DA50 RGView aircraft profile	Cirrus TRAC20View aircraft profile
Typical market year	2025	2025	2026
Estimated purchase	€808k	€1.18m	€700k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€55k	€56k	€48k
Five-year cash outlay	€1.08m	€1.46m	€938k
Cruise speed	161 kt	172 kt	155 kt
Advertised range	703 nm	820 nm	785 nm
Seats	6	5	5
Realistic payload	450 kg	432 kg	357 kg
Runway need	600 m	734 m	514 m
Data confidence	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Normalized for direct comparison	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	Excellent cabin access and useful load, but turbocharged fuel burn and maintenance make it expensive for light private use.	Spacious, efficient and modern, but expensive for a non-pressurized single and not especially fast for its acquisition cost.	A premium training platform with CAPS and modern avionics, but fleet equipment and utilization make private-model price comparisons imperfect.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner