Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Cessna T210R Turbo CenturionView aircraft profile	Piper PA-32R-301 Saratoga SPView aircraft profile	Cessna 210N CenturionView aircraft profile
Typical market year	1984	1986	1980
Estimated purchase	€410k	€290k	€258k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€76k	€84k	€94k
Five-year cash outlay	€792k	€708k	€730k
Cruise speed	182 kt	155 kt	166 kt
Advertised range	903 nm	870 nm	900 nm
Seats	6	6	6
Realistic payload	450 kg	517 kg	537 kg
Runway need	500 m	590 m	590 m
Data confidence	Preliminary, verify source data before deciding	Preliminary, verify source data before deciding	Preliminary, verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	The T210R Turbo Centurion combines 6-seat piston-aircraft utility with about 903 NM reported range and about 182 kt reported cruise, while payload, runway and operating-cost figures remain indicative and should be verified for the specific aircraft before making a decision.	A large and practical cabin with no turbo complexity, but gear, fuel burn and loading remain expensive.	Excellent speed, payload and six-seat utility, but landing-gear, structural and ageing-system maintenance can be expensive.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner