Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Dassault Falcon 2000DXView aircraft profile	Cessna Citation SovereignView aircraft profile	Cessna Citation XView aircraft profile
Typical market year	2008	2008	2008
Estimated purchase	€8.3m	€7m	€6m
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€869k	€790k	€1.09m
Five-year cash outlay	€12.64m	€10.95m	€11.44m
Cruise speed	470 kt	460 kt	525 kt
Advertised range	3250 nm	3200 nm	3460 nm
Seats	12	12	12
Realistic payload	2585 kg	3500 kg	2834 kg
Runway need	1702 m	1100 m	1600 m
Data confidence	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Normalized for direct comparison	Normalized for direct comparison
Main trade-off	The Falcon 2000DX combines 12-seat jet capability with about 3,294 NM reported range and about 459 kt reported cruise, while payload, runway and operating-cost figures remain indicative and should be verified for the specific aircraft before making a decision.	Long range, large cabin and short-field performance are excellent, but professional management, programmes and APU costs are substantial.	Exceptional transcontinental speed, but fuel burn, Rolls-Royce engine programmes and ageing systems make it expensive to own.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner