Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Embraer Phenom 100View aircraft profile	Cessna Citation MustangView aircraft profile	Eclipse Aerospace 550View aircraft profile
Typical market year	2011	2010	2015
Estimated purchase	€1.97m	€1.75m	€2.2m
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€367k	€301k	€274k
Five-year cash outlay	€3.81m	€3.25m	€3.57m
Cruise speed	406 kt	340 kt	375 kt
Advertised range	1178 nm	1167 nm	1125 nm
Seats	6	6	6
Realistic payload	450 kg	500 kg	450 kg
Runway need	972 m	948 m	657 m
Data confidence	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Normalized for direct comparison	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	The Phenom 100 combines 6-seat jet capability with about 920 NM reported range and about 371 kt reported cruise, while payload, runway and operating-cost figures remain indicative and should be verified for the specific aircraft before making a decision.	Simple, proven and relatively economical for a jet, but cabin, payload and runway margins are limited.	Remarkably efficient and compact, but the tiny fleet, manufacturer history and specialist support create liquidity and maintenance risk.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner