Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Mooney M20K 231View aircraft profile	Piper PA-28RT-201T Turbo Arrow IVView aircraft profile	Cessna 182RView aircraft profile
Typical market year	1983	1984	1984
Estimated purchase	€162k	€185k	€183k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€74k	€78k	€61k
Five-year cash outlay	€532k	€575k	€487k
Cruise speed	170 kt	165 kt	142 kt
Advertised range	1000 nm	700 nm	844 nm
Seats	4	4	4
Realistic payload	322 kg	347 kg	270 kg
Runway need	550 m	600 m	500 m
Data confidence	Normalized for direct comparison	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	Very efficient high-altitude speed, but turbo and cylinder management punish poor operating technique.	High-altitude speed and complex training value, but T-tail handling, turbo heat and landing-gear condition require care.	The 182R combines 4-seat piston-aircraft utility with about 844 NM reported range and about 142 kt reported cruise, while payload, runway and operating-cost figures remain indicative and should be verified for the specific aircraft before making a decision.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner