Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Cessna 210N CenturionView aircraft profile	Cessna P210NView aircraft profile	Cessna 185F SkywagonView aircraft profile
Typical market year	1980	1980	1980
Estimated purchase	€258k	€218k	€350k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€94k	€76k	€87k
Five-year cash outlay	€730k	€600k	€787k
Cruise speed	166 kt	187 kt	145 kt
Advertised range	900 nm	925 nm	720 nm
Seats	6	6	6
Realistic payload	537 kg	517 kg	557 kg
Runway need	590 m	658 m	350 m
Data confidence	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	Excellent speed, payload and six-seat utility, but landing-gear, structural and ageing-system maintenance can be expensive.	The P210N combines 6-seat piston-aircraft utility with about 434 NM reported range and about 179 kt reported cruise, while payload, runway and operating-cost figures remain indicative and should be verified for the specific aircraft before making a decision.	Superb payload and backcountry capability, but tailwheel history, corrosion and float or STOL modifications drive value.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner