Interactive comparison

Compare ownership, not brochures

Purchase price is only one part of the decision. Figures are indicative estimates at the typical market year for each model.

Decision factor	Piper PA-28-181 Archer IIView aircraft profile	Piper Warrior IIView aircraft profile	Cessna R172K Hawk XPView aircraft profile
Typical market year	1979	1979	1979
Estimated purchase	€144k	€109k	€175k
Annual cash cost at 80 h	€67k	€62k	€65k
Five-year cash outlay	€479k	€421k	€499k
Cruise speed	121 kt	118 kt	130 kt
Advertised range	522 nm	525 nm	575 nm
Seats	4	4	4
Realistic payload	343 kg	368 kg	321 kg
Runway need	490 m	490 m	415 m
Data confidence	Normalized for direct comparison	Normalized for direct comparison	Preliminary — verify source data before deciding
Main trade-off	Predictable, comfortable and easy to support, but training history and avionics can outweigh age.	Predictable and widely supported, but four adults with bags and meaningful fuel are rarely realistic.	The R172K Hawk XP combines 4-seat piston-aircraft utility with about 334 NM reported range and about 115 kt reported cruise, while payload, runway and operating-cost figures remain indicative and should be verified for the specific aircraft before making a decision.

Popular head-to-head guides

Start with the decision pilots are actually researching

Each guide adds mission context and links back into the live comparison and Finder.

Two premium piston singles with very different answers to speed, fuel, cabin design and ownership complexity.

A fast, refined travelling aircraft against a slower utility platform built around payload and access.

Two leading single-engine turboprops that optimise for different combinations of speed, cabin volume and payload.

Modern diesel efficiency and composite design compared with a conventional turbocharged piston twin.

A modern Jet A trainer and tourer compared with the most familiar four-seat training platform.

No generic winner